The ruling military: Military officers seized power in Islamic countries, namely Sudan and Pakistan, where the judgment before the coup, democratic society. The first is an officer of General Omar al-Basher, who coup in June 30, 1989 against the elected Government of Sadiq al-Mahdi in the Sudan, and the other is General Perez Musharraf, who executed a military coup against the elected Government of Nawaz Sharif in October in October 1999 in Pakistan. Coup against the elected governments in their countries is considered a great crime and high treason because of their only duty is to protect internal security and protect the country from external threats, and thus committed a crime they deserve the severest penalties, and all the faithful in their people should make the utmost effort for submission of a fair and impartial trial to be a lesson for all Aspirant adventurer-rule in their countries or in other countries. We have transformed their countries into two dictatorships plagued corruption in the branches of the state, and the time lost in combating corrupt rule had long especially for the Sudanese dictator, it was possible to use the time to build the two countries and to concentrate efforts to eradicate poverty, ignorance and backwardness and countless battle with the corrupt and poverty. It was injury time-consuming and difficult to compensation, as well as the effects of major crime in the seizure of government and non-attributable as did two former in Sudan (General soar althahab) and Mauritania also three years ago, will remain the devastating effects of a long period of time, in a world moving towards Democracy, freedom, and make efforts towards development and advancement. Musharraf remains the resignation on 18 \ 8 \ 2008 is the difference between him and Sudanese dictator who refuses to resign even after an indictment has been officially at the International Criminal Tribunal directly responsible for crimes against humanity in Darfur. The crimes occurred in various regions of Sudan during the reign of Basher's health is sufficient to bring charges on him and that his plot to divide Sudan is a funny and Mbeki at the same time, this dictator, still backward links between the ignorant person and between town and makes the separation between them to divide Sudan!! While the reverse is true if often the dictators are responsible for tearing their home countries and their peoples. Behavior of General Musharraf is initially valid and that came late before, and the insistence by General al-Basher is to continue through the error and then meant that its criminal acts in power, will not forgive him for his resignation Or his eagerness to submit himself voluntarily to the International Tribunal. A big difference between them, but for the forgiveness of Musharraf's dictatorial rule, civilized behavior resign, and also due to be submitted to a fair trial. The Sudanese dictator fact that after that destroyed people and tore his duty to exert pressure for submission to the Court in order to be a lesson for himself and others, and take punished just as committed his hands, especially since an ideal model of military barbarism in the third world that do not stand against any laws and constitutions and freedoms ... ..
ليست هناك تعليقات:
إرسال تعليق