إجمالي مرات مشاهدة الصفحة

2008/08/29

against the defense of the governors

In response to some people how to select some of the country's Islamic rulers, mostly from Saudi Arabia, of course, their responses in the majority of almost one idea, but different terms, a natural fact that education in some Arab countries, especially Saudi Arabia is not meant indoctrination helps you to move the mind and give him the freedom to Express an opinion even if it is valid stuffing texts and materials, ready-majority religious interpretations according to one interpretation within the system does not accept the newly important debate conflicting chatter among themselves and back the contradiction between their texts and, of course, different interpretations of those doctrines and opinions of others. Of course there are some responses did not deserve the detailed reply which say that Muslims are not satisfied, you are against the Islamic regime, a funny mix between reality and the shameful behavior of Muslims and the Islamic religion and different regulations, especially in politics and sociology, which does not differ by one, and the reality of Muslims and failure and ignorance and being away from human civilization , Nor have the lowest ranking economic power, political and military reality is no different except DISSIDENT" ignorant, which anyone travels to the country developed will note the big difference especially in teaching methods and behavior and culture are accorded the dignity deserved rights. Another respondent says it may not be going against whatever the ruling unjust!! When the reply sent to him said that verse 59 of Nisa in the Koran that says (and obey Allah and His Messenger and the rulers of you ...) prove that the doctrine according to the Sunnis, according to him, and to maintain The unity of Muslims and duty ... Of course this question and protest repeated throughout history and the merging of due obedience to the Koran and obedience to the rulers of yesterday and today is talk of weakness and absurdity is unparalleled.. that obedience interpreted by scholars from different sects according to the scientists, or some of the imams or Righteous twelve others according to an agreed, but different in the identification of these, the Shiites agreed on the names, the year was not even agree among themselves to determine who, sometimes add some rulers of the Umayya state despot them only to supplement existing!!, Others Interpreted that matter are the rulers and princes who obey scientists, which was not the reality now mainly the fact that now the rulers could not afford to oppose any person, whatever the size or age or stature, how things obey scientists in religion, and therefore, according to the interpretation of obedience to the rulers of these conditions are not available Now. Another explanation which remains weak, particularly on the mental and requiring obedience to the Governor whatever his conduct, which promoted him scholars of the sultans since the Umayyad era, yet despite the fact that such obedience incompatible with Islamic teachings in obedience to the creature contentment
God, but according to this explanation is ridiculous strike texts Established disregard for the sake of preserving big families volatile empty!! As well as access to the ruling power which is very important according to some doctrines are under a framework of consultation and selection of the fittest, but there is now the rulers were chosen according to this method? Answer is no one everyone came as the logic of force and treachery and stay in office until the grave!! Thus, Shura according to the logic of selection which is equivalent to a free election in modern democracies is not available and also survive for a certain period and in accordance with limited powers does not exist at all. The logic of defending dictators regardless of their nationality or their religion or their place or method of arrival of the judgment, is weak and contradictory logic does not accept the logic does not mind not keeping pace with the realities of other nations that have chosen the path of democracy and freedom of behavior and approach in political work is valid for all countries and peoples regardless argued opposed each Ignorant, stubborn puts shackles on his mind, heart and tongue .... The talk about the dictators by supporters of their people is so absurd and Banality better not to respond and indicate the size of the victims and revolutions only. The spread of a culture of blind obedience to the rulers is a catastrophe for the Islamic nation is still raised and will remain so remove the last remaining post of his entourage who governs with a drum regardless of the quality of that footnote be hazardous if included among its ranks some of the clergy or intellectuals who sell their religion and the thoughts and principles for the one who pays .. And more cautious consequence of the "Free the oppressed ....

ليست هناك تعليقات: